All I can do is shake my head at this attempt by Gavin Newsome. I doubt that we'll see it reported by the MSM outlets.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CN) ? A federal judge ruled Wednesday that California's law prohibiting altered election-related communications doesn?t pass constitutional scrutiny and the state can't enforce it.

https://www.courthousenews.com/federal- ... ation-law/

Doesn't mean they won't try. Remember, we must actively fight against those who would strip us of our rights. If we sit by and do nothing, we'll be naked before we know it.

That's a fact, and they do so with impunity and that needs to be fixed.

It should be a crime of some sort to try again act against the constitution.

JaySmith wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:47 am It should be a crime of some sort to try again act against the constitution.

You mean like "Treason"

olderguy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:50 am

JaySmith wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:47 am It should be a crime of some sort to try again act against the constitution.

You mean like "Treason"

That would be fine with me.

olderguy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:50 am

JaySmith wrote: ↑Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:47 am It should be a crime of some sort to try again act against the constitution.

You mean like "Treason"

Perfect, now charge them for it and sentence them for it.

I just hope that Trump makes good on his promise of vengeance against those who have trespassed against him.